📢 Exclusive on Gate Square — #PROVE Creative Contest# is Now Live!
CandyDrop × Succinct (PROVE) — Trade to share 200,000 PROVE 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46469
Futures Lucky Draw Challenge: Guaranteed 1 PROVE Airdrop per User 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46491
🎁 Endless creativity · Rewards keep coming — Post to share 300 PROVE!
📅 Event PeriodAugust 12, 2025, 04:00 – August 17, 2025, 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1.Publish original content on Gate Square related to PROVE or the above activities (minimum 100 words; any format: analysis, tutorial, creativ
In the Web3 space, we often overlook an important fact: the operational logic of blockchain smart contracts fundamentally differs from human thought processes. This difference is not only reflected at the technical level but also profoundly affects our understanding and evaluation of blockchain projects.
One of the core characteristics of Blockchain is its immutability. In contrast, humans are easily influenced by various external factors, including temptations of interest. This fundamental difference directly affects our judgment of the project's security.
For example, when we talk about liquidity locking, human thinking might assume that there is still a risk of being removed or abused even when liquidity is 100% locked, burned, and ownership is abandoned. However, from the perspective of smart contracts, once these conditions are met, liquidity cannot be removed or used for fraudulent activities.
This raises a key question: how do project developers truly demonstrate their sincerity? Relying solely on smart contracts audits is far from enough. In fact, relinquishing ownership and locking liquidity should become the standard practice in project development, as this better reflects the developers' good intentions than simply relying on smart contracts audits.
It is worth noting that while smart contracts audits have their value, they should not be seen as the sole indicator of a project's credibility. For inexperienced investors, over-relying on audit results may be misleading.
Therefore, we recommend that Web3 participants should develop the habit of directly verifying smart contracts and their functions on official Blockchain explorers (such as BscScan). Other tools can serve as auxiliary references, but should not be fully relied upon.
Overall, understanding and recognizing the fundamental differences between blockchain smart contracts and human logical thinking is crucial for appropriately evaluating and participating in Web3 projects. This not only helps investors make more informed decisions, but also promotes the entire industry towards a more transparent and reliable direction.