In the Web3 space, we often overlook an important fact: the operational logic of blockchain smart contracts fundamentally differs from human thought processes. This difference is not only reflected at the technical level but also profoundly affects our understanding and evaluation of blockchain projects.



One of the core characteristics of Blockchain is its immutability. In contrast, humans are easily influenced by various external factors, including temptations of interest. This fundamental difference directly affects our judgment of the project's security.

For example, when we talk about liquidity locking, human thinking might assume that there is still a risk of being removed or abused even when liquidity is 100% locked, burned, and ownership is abandoned. However, from the perspective of smart contracts, once these conditions are met, liquidity cannot be removed or used for fraudulent activities.

This raises a key question: how do project developers truly demonstrate their sincerity? Relying solely on smart contracts audits is far from enough. In fact, relinquishing ownership and locking liquidity should become the standard practice in project development, as this better reflects the developers' good intentions than simply relying on smart contracts audits.

It is worth noting that while smart contracts audits have their value, they should not be seen as the sole indicator of a project's credibility. For inexperienced investors, over-relying on audit results may be misleading.

Therefore, we recommend that Web3 participants should develop the habit of directly verifying smart contracts and their functions on official Blockchain explorers (such as BscScan). Other tools can serve as auxiliary references, but should not be fully relied upon.

Overall, understanding and recognizing the fundamental differences between blockchain smart contracts and human logical thinking is crucial for appropriately evaluating and participating in Web3 projects. This not only helps investors make more informed decisions, but also promotes the entire industry towards a more transparent and reliable direction.
View Original
post-image
post-image
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 5h ago
Who said that smart contracts are stable? Don't be ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 21h ago
It's another rough audit before going live...
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 08-13 23:45
It's quite ridiculous that the human brain will never win against code.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggarvip
· 08-13 13:50
There's nothing certain, it's all about the contract and one's character.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImpostervip
· 08-13 13:50
Is it really that reliable?
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEatervip
· 08-13 13:47
Aren't you exaggerating?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinjavip
· 08-13 13:45
I admire that contracts are more reliable than people.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 08-13 13:44
It's that time again when I'm best at fishing~
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 08-13 13:40
Who still looks at contracts now?
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)