The Mystery of Bitcoin Double Spending: Rare Vulnerabilities and Future Challenges

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Bitcoin Trading Repetition Phenomenon: An Interesting but Low-Risk Vulnerability

Overview

Bitcoin transactions typically use unspent outputs by referencing the ID of a previous transaction. These outputs can only be spent once; otherwise, it leads to a double-spending problem. However, in Bitcoin's history, there have been indeed two sets of completely identical transactions. This situation occurs because coinbase transactions do not have inputs and instead generate new coins. Therefore, two different coinbase transactions can potentially be constructed in exactly the same way, resulting in their transaction IDs being the same. Besides this, duplicate transaction IDs can only occur due to hash collisions, but this is nearly impossible in cryptographically secure hash functions.

These two sets of duplicate transactions occurred between November 14 and 15, 2010, spanning approximately 16 hours. Although d5d2....8599 appeared later on the blockchain than e3bf....b468, we still categorize it as the first duplicate transaction.

Bitcoin's duplicate transaction: an interesting bug with minimal risk

Duplicate transaction details

The mempool.space block explorer shows the case of the first duplicate transaction appearing in two different blocks. Interestingly, different block explorers may have different default behaviors when displaying duplicate transactions.

Among the four blocks involved, only one block contained other transactions, merging 1 BTC and 19 BTC into a single output of 20 BTC.

Bitcoin's Duplicate Transactions: An Interesting Bug with Minimal Risk

Repeatable Output Spendability

The value of each repeated transaction is 50 BTC, involving a total of 200 BTC or 100 BTC, depending on the understanding. As of now, these Bitcoins have not been spent. Theoretically, the person with the relevant private keys can spend these Bitcoins, but only 100 BTC can actually be recovered because the repeated 50 BTC cannot be spent. As for which block these coins will be spent from, it may be undefined.

Bitcoin's Duplicate Transactions: An Interesting Bug with Minimal Risk

The Issue of Repeated Transactions

Duplicate transactions can cause confusion for wallets and block explorers, and may also pose potential attack risks. For example, it could lead to double spending or attacks on exchanges.

Solutions

To address the issue of double spending, the Bitcoin community has taken the following measures:

  1. BIP30: Introduced and implemented in 2012, it prohibits the use of duplicate TXIDs for transactions unless the previous TXID has been spent.

  2. BIP34: Activated in 2013, requires the coinbase transaction to include the block height, ensuring that all transactions should be unique.

  3. Stop BIP30 Check: In 2015, due to the implementation of BIP34, nodes stopped the costly BIP30 check.

Bitcoin's Duplicate Transactions: A Low-Risk Interesting Bug

Potential Risks

Although BIP34 resolved most issues, there is still a potential risk of duplication in some blocks prior to the activation of BIP34, where the scriptSigs of the coinbase transactions may match future block heights. The next block that may have a duplicate transaction is 1,983,702, which is expected to be generated around January 2046.

Bitcoin Repeated Transactions: An Interesting Bug with Minimal Risk

Conclusion

Considering the difficulty and cost of copying trades, as well as the scarcity of opportunities to exploit it, this vulnerability does not pose a major security threat to Bitcoin. However, due to its uniqueness and long-term impact, it remains an interesting issue worth monitoring. A complete fix for this problem may be required in the future through methods such as soft forks.

Bitcoin's Duplicate Transactions: A Low-Risk Interesting Bug

BTC0.4%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SillyWhalevip
· 21h ago
The vulnerability is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrincevip
· 21h ago
Early code was really casual.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdropvip
· 21h ago
Blockchain is not that simple.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatientvip
· 21h ago
Don't panic if the hash value is broken.
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurkervip
· 22h ago
The details back then were truly frightening.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearchervip
· 22h ago
The hidden bug has been discovered.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)